JackSpirio's profile

Avatar
User
NB Posts : 146
Created :
Last visit :
User signature :
multiple_version DA: icon_succes
flag_curse_sm VG: icon_succes PoC: icon_succes IM: icon_succes
VotE icon_succes SoM icon_succes

Card clarification/ situational icon

64x64
Posted
#1
Spoiler where you find the icon:
In each city

Boneshrub

64x64
Posted
#2
Technically you can’t even fight it, because you never reach the otherwise part.

Card 484

64x64
Posted
#3
I did get 3 from that card and 2 from other spaces (which were banished).

Involved Characters

64x64
Posted
#4
The rules say that mandatory actions involve all on the terrain, so it doesn’t really matter who explores.

Exploration card error

64x64
Posted
#5
Yeah, the text heavily implies that you have defeated the enemy. Both cards also state otherwise: so technically the discard this part isn’t needed on the right card (as temporary event) but on the left it is needed (as it’s a permanent event).
As it is now, the left card can’t be removed once your knowledge is 15+

[No error] Dialogue 172 (spoiler if you go read it: result of a puzzle)

64x64
Posted
#6
No it’s not, as already answered above, you get the second reward only if the first is available, so you can only ever solve it once as 124 will never be available after that.

[Exploit] Infinite 150 cards in taverns

64x64
Posted
#7
Getting
150
is so easy, having another way to get it doesn’t break anything

Parcels to deliver?

64x64
Posted
#8
I found 2, but don’t remember where.
Both
were bad.
1.
told the receiver to attack me

2.
attacked the receiver

Infinite recover combo

64x64
Posted
#9
I don’t have the cards in front, but what cardtype does the Abunothus unblock

Interaction between Arthen's Inspiration and A0101

64x64
Posted
#10
So you found the same exploit as me, just the other way around.
Seems like the errata wasn’t good enough a fix 😅

News for the site and forum

64x64
Posted
#11
The English version already contains the correct text

[No error] "A rare find" side quest error

64x64
Posted
#12
No initiating has nothing to do with the preparation phase. So A is correct and I think this was pretty clear, as you don’t have a number to read.

Compound actions, temporary events, and "losing fights"

64x64
Posted
#13
I assume winning a fight means you reach a white box that tells you to return/discard/banish and losing means it’s in a black box.

Card 347 result?

64x64
Posted
#14
TimeLordXT wrote:
the green 347 dont have anything say about discard it, but i have a gold card is this a missprinted?

There are other ways to get rid of a card.
The game will tell you.

Sometimes you have gold cards you won’t ever see, as you own an expansion that makes the gold card useless.

Serious Poulp Shop vs. new Kicstarter campaign

64x64
Posted
#15
It‘s KicKstarter

Can I barter blocked items?

64x64
Posted
#16
Lorkenpeist wrote:
I would think a cumbersome item would still make it hard to move even if damaged (e.g., you can't use "On the Double" if you carry an item with CUMBERSOME). So... Maybe it's okay to trade my torn Cape? The rules do explicitly say to interpret them in my favor if it's ambiguous -)

No, blocked cumbersome items don’t count and you can move.

Timing of Use ? (Satchel Card / Hand card)

64x64
Posted
#17
Yes to both

[Confirmed] Arthen Inspiration is too strong in combo with Speciality

64x64
Posted
#18
Karbous wrote:
A similar case - as a consequence of an action, you get a card hand_blue_add and you loose life damage (a common consequence in battle compound actions). If that hand_blue_add card is for example "Alert", which has a shield effect, you cannot use that card for blocking damage you got from this action.


This is because the hand_blue_add effect is the last thing you do, so the damage is already done.
This is different to the effect used here.

[Confirmed] Arthen Inspiration is too strong in combo with Speciality

64x64
Posted
#19
I now played the next scenario with my proposed errata and it was way more interesting again, after it became a bit boring with that exploit.

[No error] Two errors

64x64
Posted
#20
Maybe it’s because I‘m not a native speaker, but I had read the sentence always the way it was intended.
However I see that consider can also be used in a different way. But as people rightfully say, that writing is confusing and shouldn’t be used. So I don’t understand, why they think it is an error and not that it should be read differently.